The precedent How it works Pricing FAQ Free audit
Our story

We believe every company should be able to prove
what its AI tells its customers.

Founded in France by engineers, ClaimSentry was born from a simple shift: companies now deploy AI agents that speak to their customers — and what those agents say is binding. We built the platform that verifies it and proves it.

Why we built this

In February 2024, a tribunal held Air Canada responsible for inaccurate information its own support chatbot gave a customer (Moffatt v. Air Canada, 2024 BCCRT 149). The argument that the chatbot was a separate entity was rejected.

Every company that deploys a customer-facing AI agent is now exposed to the same reasoning. Yet most have no systematic way to check whether their agent stays within their contractual commitments — SLAs, warranties, pricing, terms — or to prove it did at a given date.

ClaimSentry is our answer: extract your commitments, test your agent against each one, countersign every verdict, and seal it into an Evidence Pack you can verify independently.

Made in France, and why it matters

We build in France because data sovereignty is a value, not a feature. Your commitments and your agents' responses are sensitive. They belong to you and should remain in infrastructure you control.

ClaimSentry is available fully on-premise. Each customer runs in an isolated instance with a dedicated database. Secrets are encrypted at rest, and the LLM judge can run entirely inside your perimeter.

Built on open standards

We publish your verified commitments through the Model Context Protocol so any MCP-capable agent you operate can ground its answers in your official facts. No proprietary lock-in.

The judge LLM is configurable: bring your own OpenAI-compatible key, or run a model inside your own network. Your data never has to touch a shared LLM budget.

Evidence by design

Knowing what an AI agent said is one thing; proving it later is another. Each ClaimSentry verdict is hashed (SHA-256) and carries an RFC 3161 electronic timestamp, delivered as a .tsr token you can verify yourself with standard tools.

Under Article 41 of the eIDAS Regulation (EU 910/2014), an electronic timestamp is admissible as evidence in legal proceedings; with a qualified timestamping authority, it enjoys a presumption of the accuracy of its date and the integrity of the data. ClaimSentry supports qualified TSAs. It builds the diligence file that supports your obligations — it is not a certification.

Accuracy first

Every verdict is grounded in your reference documents and countersigned by a human, with the exact source excerpt that defines correctness.

Sovereign by design

Isolated instances, on-premise deployment, internal judge. Your data stays where you decide it stays.

Provable, not just plausible

Every verdict is RFC 3161-timestamped and independently verifiable. Your compliance team gets a diligence file — not just a report.

Get in touch

For sales, partnerships, or press inquiries: contact@claimsentry.io